CPR INSTRUCTION BY VIDEOTAPE - RESULTS OF A COMMUNITY PROJECT

Citation
M. Eisenberg et al., CPR INSTRUCTION BY VIDEOTAPE - RESULTS OF A COMMUNITY PROJECT, Annals of emergency medicine, 25(2), 1995, pp. 198-202
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
ISSN journal
01960644
Volume
25
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
198 - 202
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0644(1995)25:2<198:CIBV-R>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Study objective: To increase the rate of bystander CPR in a community by use of a free, mailed, 10-minute videotape of CPR instruction. Desi gn: Prospective, randomized intervention trial. One half of the househ olds (8,659) received the free videotape (videotape group) and were co nsidered the intervention group, and one half (8,659) served as the co ntrol (no-videotape group). All households were followed from December 1991 to March 1993 to determine whether a cardiac arrest occurred and who initiated CPR. A telephone interview obtained additional informat ion about circumstances of the arrest and whether members of the house hold viewed the videotape. Setting: City of Everett and South Snohomis h County, Washington. A commercial mailing list was used to identify 1 7,318 households with a head of the household who was more than 50 yea rs old. Participants: A case was defined as a cardiac arrest in which CPR was initiated or continued by emergency medical services personnel . Only cardiac arrests due to presumed underlying heart disease were i ncluded. Arrests occurring after arrival of emergency medical services personnel were not included. Interventions: The intervention was a fr ee 10-minute videotape with CPR instructions mailed to the 8,659 inter vention households. Paramedic run reports were reviewed and interviews were conducted with cardiac arrest bystanders to determine who initia ted CPR and whether they had received and viewed the videotape. Result s: Sixty-five cardiac arrests occurred in the study households: 31 in households that received the videotape and 34 in households that did n ot review the videotape, The overall rate of bystander CPR was 47% in the videotape group and 53% in the no-videotape group (P=NS). In nine cardiac arrests, an individual was present who had watched the videota pe; six of these nine cases (66%) had bystander CPR. Conclusion: Mass mailings of CPR instructional videos are likely to be ineffective in i ncreasing the rate of bystander CPR in a community.