INTERACTIONS BETWEEN IPRIFLAVONE AND THE ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR

Citation
M. Petilli et al., INTERACTIONS BETWEEN IPRIFLAVONE AND THE ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR, Calcified tissue international, 56(2), 1995, pp. 160-165
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
0171967X
Volume
56
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
160 - 165
Database
ISI
SICI code
0171-967X(1995)56:2<160:IBIATE>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Estrogen replacement therapy is effective in the prevention of postmen opausal osteoporosis, and a direct action of 17-beta-estradiol (17 bet a E(2)) on osteoblastic and osteoclastic cells has been demonstrated. The inhibition of bone resorption by ipriflavone (IP), an isoflavone d erivative devoid of estrogenic properties but active in potentiating t he effects of estrogen on bone tissue, has been shown in in vitro and in vivo studies and confirmed by clinical data. To investigate the mol ecular mechanisms that underlie IP effect, we studied the possible int eractions of IP and its four main in vivo metabolites (I, II, III, and V) with the estrogen receptor (ER) in the human preosteoclastic cell line FLG 29.1, whose growth and function are modulated by the compound . In parallel experiments, the human breast cancer cell line MCF7 was also analyzed. IP binding sites were demonstrated in the nuclear fract ion of FLG 29.1 cells. 17 beta E(2) and other steroid compounds failed to displace IP binding to intact FLG 29.1 cells. Similarly, IP and me tabolites I, III, and V were not able to displace 17 beta E(2) binding to intact MCF7 cells, whereas metabolite II showed an IC50 of 61 nM. 17 beta E(2) binding to FLG 29.1 cells was increased after preincubati on with metabolites I, III, and V. IP and its metabolites did not indu ce ER-dependent gene expression in FLG 29.1 and MCF7 cells transfected with a reporter gene and an estrogen response element (ERE). These re sults suggest that IP effects on osteoclast precursors are not mediate d by a direct interaction with the ER, even if a crosstalk between the mechanisms of action of IP and 17 beta E(2) cannot be excluded.