M. Selart et al., VIOLATIONS OF PROCEDURE INVARIANCE IN PREFERENCE MEASUREMENT - COGNITIVE EXPLANATIONS, European journal of cognitive psychology, 6(4), 1994, pp. 417-436
A violation of procedure invariance in preference measurement is that
the predominant or prominent attribute looms larger in choice than in
a matching task. In Experiment 1, this so-called prominence effect was
demonstrated for choices between pairs of options, choices to accept
single options, and preference ratings of single options. That is, in
all these response modes the prominent attribute loomed larger than in
matching. The results were replicated in Experiment 2, in which subje
cts chose between or rated their preference for pairs of options which
were matched to be equally attractive either in the same session or 1
week earlier. On the basis of these and previous results, it is argue
d that the prominence effect is a reliable phenomenon. However, none o
f several cognitive explanations which have been offered appears to be
completely viable.