CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE DOXORUBICIN VS CISPLATIN TENIPOSIDE IN THE TREATMENTOF CHILDREN OLDER THAN 12 MONTHS OF AGE WITH DISSEMINATED NEUROBLASTOMA - A PEDIATRIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP RANDOMIZED PHASE-II STUDY
Nb. Mcwilliams et al., CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE DOXORUBICIN VS CISPLATIN TENIPOSIDE IN THE TREATMENTOF CHILDREN OLDER THAN 12 MONTHS OF AGE WITH DISSEMINATED NEUROBLASTOMA - A PEDIATRIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP RANDOMIZED PHASE-II STUDY, Medical and pediatric oncology, 24(3), 1995, pp. 176-180
This prospective study was designed to estimate the response rates and
to compare two drug pairs, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin (Cy/A) and ci
splatin/teniposide (P1/VM) in previously untreated patients with disse
minated neuroblastoma >12 months of age at diagnosis. Estimated comple
te clinical response rates after five courses of therapy were 13% (70
patients) and 22% (64 patients) for Cy/A and P1/VM, respectively (P =
0.17). After surgical removal of residual tumors in patients with part
ial response, the complete response rates were 27% and 34% (P = 0.50),
respectively. The overall CR/PR rates after induction and surgery wer
e 59% and 73% (P = 0.077). There was no significant difference in even
t free survival (P = 0.48) or survival (P = 0.40). Five year survival
on the two arms were 14% (SE = 5%) and 12% (SE = 4%), respectively. To
xicity was significant but manageable. The Cy/A arm had significantly
higher hematopoietic toxicity but significantly lower GI toxicity. Sig
nificant allergic reactions were seen with the P1/VM arm, none in the
Cy/A arm. Given the activity of these two regimens, further therapy wi
th a combination of these regimens is suggested. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss,
Inc.