Dj. Azurin et al., THE EFFICACY OF EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA FOR ENDOSCOPIC PREPERITONEAL HERNIORRHAPHY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY, Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery, 6(6), 1996, pp. 369-373
Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has been criticized because of the need for
general anesthesia. The endoscopic preperitoneal approach allows the
use of epidural anesthesia, obviating the potential complications and
side effects seen with general anesthesia. The purpose of this study w
as to determine the efficacy of epidural anesthesia for preperitoneal
herniorrhaphy. Fifty-two patients underwent repair of a total of 80 he
rnias over a 6-month period. Thirty-six patients underwent their repai
rs with the use of epidural anesthesia with the goal of a T-4 sensory
level. A tension-free prosthetic repair was performed in all patients.
Seventeen patients had unilateral repairs and nineteen had bilateral
repairs under epidural, while seven patients had unilateral repairs an
d nine patients had bilateral repairs under general anesthesia. There
were no significant differences in patient demographics. All herniorrh
aphies were electively performed on an outpatient basis by a single su
rgeon (A.L.S.) in a teaching setting. There were no significant differ
ences for unilateral and bilateral repairs when type of anesthesia was
compared. There was only one conversion from epidural to general anes
thesia, secondary to poor sensory blockade first noticed during creati
on of the preperitoneal space (97% success rate). Seven patients recei
ving epidural anesthesia experienced pneumoperitoneum during the proce
dure. This did not effect the ability to perform the hernia repair suc
cessfully. There were no complications related to the epidural anesthe
tic. Endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy can be performed effective
ly under epidural anesthesia, obviating the need for general anesthesi
a.