Pa. Hill et al., OSTEOBLASTS MEDIATE INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR-I AND GROWTH-FACTOR-IISTIMULATION OF OSTEOCLAST FORMATION AND FUNCTION, Endocrinology, 136(1), 1995, pp. 124-131
Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-II have powerful, well de
fined effects on osteoblastic cells, stimulating their proliferation a
nd inducing collagen synthesis, but the role of IGF-I and -II in modul
ating osteoclast differentiation and activity remains unclear. We firs
t examined the bone-resorptive effects of IGF-I and IGF-II by assessin
g Ca-45(2+) release from neonatal mouse calvarial bones. Both IGFs dos
e dependently stimulated bone resorption, with an EC(50) of 8 x 10(-9)
M for IGF-I and 2 x 10(-8) M for IGF-II. We then tested the effects o
f the IGFs on bone resorption by rat isolated osteoclasts cultured on
ivory slices. Neither IGF-I nor IGF-II stimulated isolated osteoclast
activity. However, in the presence of either primary mouse osteoblasts
or human osteosarcoma MG 63 cells, both IGFs enhanced osteoclast reso
rptive activity, with an EC(50) of 5 x 10(-10) M for IGF-I and 10(-9)
M for IGF-II. Stimulation was not mediated by BALB/c/3T3 cells, a nono
steoblastic cell line. The effects of the IGFs were blocked by alpha I
R-3, an antibody to the type I IGF receptor, but not by beta-galactosi
dase, a lysosomal enzyme that competes with IGF-II for the type II IGF
receptor. We then examined the effects of the IGFs on the formation o
f osteoclast-like multinucleate cells (MNCs) in mouse bone marrow cult
ures. IGF-I and -II dose dependently increased the number of tartrate-
resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive MNCs, although their effect
s were less than that of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3 (a hormone that ind
uces osteoclast differentiation). No TRAP-positive MNCs appeared in th
e absence of these hormones. Like authentic osteoclasts, the TRAP-posi
tive MNCs formed in response to IGF-I and -II bound [I-125]salmon calc
itonin. When mouse bone marrow cells were cultured on ivory slices in
the presence of either IGF-I or IGF-II for 10 days, numerous resorptio
n lacunae were formed. beta-Galactosidase had no effect on IGF-mediate
d osteoclast formation. These results are strong evidence that both IG
F-I and IGF-II stimulate bone resorption in vitro by enhancing osteocl
ast formation and function. Our data also suggest that the IGFs act th
rough the intermediary of osteoblastic cells to stimulate osteoclast a
ctivity and that the type I, but not the type II, IGF receptor is invo
lved in their responses. We propose that the local production of IGF-I
and IGF-II may modulate both osteoblast-osteoclast interactions and o
steoclast formation and play an important role in bone remodeling.