IDENTIFICATION OF GROUP-SPECIFIC AND STRAIN-SPECIFIC GENETIC-MARKERS FOR GLOBALLY DISTRIBUTED ALEXANDRIUM (DINOPHYCEAE) .2. SEQUENCE-ANALYSIS OF A FRAGMENT OF THE LSU RIBOSOMAL-RNA GENE
Ca. Scholin et al., IDENTIFICATION OF GROUP-SPECIFIC AND STRAIN-SPECIFIC GENETIC-MARKERS FOR GLOBALLY DISTRIBUTED ALEXANDRIUM (DINOPHYCEAE) .2. SEQUENCE-ANALYSIS OF A FRAGMENT OF THE LSU RIBOSOMAL-RNA GENE, Journal of phycology, 30(6), 1994, pp. 999-1011
A fragment of the large-subunit (LSU) ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) from t
he marine finoflagellates Alexandrium tamarense (Lebour) Balech, A. ca
tenella (Whedon et Kofoid) Balech, A. fundyense Balech, A. affine (Fuk
uyo et Inoue) Balech, A. minutum Halim, A. lusitanicum Balech, and A.
andersoni Balech was cloned and sequenced to assess inter- and intrasp
ecific relationships. Cultures examined were from North America, weste
rn Europe, Thailand, Japan, Australia, and the ballast water of severa
l cargo vessels and included both toxic and nontoxic isolates. Parsimo
ny analyses revealed eight major classes of sequences, or ''ribotypes,
'' indicative of both species- and strain-specific genetic markers. Fi
ve ribotypes subdivided members of the A. tamarense/catenella/ fundyen
se species cluster (the ''tamarensis complex'') but did not correlate
with morphospecies designations. The three remaining ribotypes were as
sociated with cultures that clearly differ morphologically from the ta
marensis complex. These distinct sequences were typified by 1) A. affi
ne, 2) A. minutum and A. lusitanicum, and 3) A. andersoni. LSU rDNA fr
om A. minutum and A. lusitanicum was indistinguishable. An isolate's a
bility to produce toxin, or lack thereof, was consistent within phylog
enetic terminal taxa. Results of this study are in complete agreement
with conclusions from previous work using restriction fragment-length
polymorphism analysis of small-subunit rRNA genes, but the LSU rDNA se
quences provided finer-scale species and population resolution. The fi
ve divergent lineages of the tamarensis complex appeared indicative of
regional populations; representatives collected from the same geograp
hic region were the most similar, regardless of morphotype, whereas th
ose from geographically separated populations were more divergent even
when the same morphospecies were compared. Contrary to this general p
attern, A. tamarense and A. catenella from Japan were exceptionally he
terogeneous, displaying sequences associated with Australian, North Am
erican, and western European isolates. This diversity may stem from in
troductions of A. tamarense to Japan from genetically divergent source
s in North America and western Europe. Alexandrium catenella from Japa
n and Australia appeared identical, suggesting that these two regional
populations share a recent, common ancestry. One explanation for this
genetic continuity was suggested by A. catenella cysts transported fr
om Japan to Australia via ships' ballast water: the cysts contained LS
U rDNA sequences that were indistinguishable from those of known popul
ations of A. catenella in both Japan and Australia. Ships ballasted in
South Korea and Japan have also fostered a dispersal of viable A. tam
arense cysts to Australia, but their LSU rDNA sequences indicated they
are genetically distinct from A. tamarense/catenella previously found
in Australia and genetically distinct from each other, as well. Human
-assisted dispersal is a plausible mechanism for inoculating a region
with diverse representatives of the tamarensis complex from geographic
ally and genetically distinct source populations. The D1-D2 region of
Alexandrium LSU rDNA is a valuable taxonomic and biogeographic marker
and a useful genetic reference for addressing dispersal hypotheses.