Imcm. Rietjens et al., DIFFERENT METABOLIC PATHWAYS OF 2,5-DIFLUORONITROBENZENE AND 2,5-DIFLUOROAMINOBENZENE COMPARED TO MOLECULAR-ORBITAL SUBSTRATE CHARACTERISTICS, Chemico-biological interactions, 94(1), 1995, pp. 49-72
The in vivo metabolite patterns of 2,5-difluoroaminobenzene and of its
nitrobenzene analogue, 2,5-difluoronitrobenzene, were determined usin
g F-19 NMR analysis of urine samples. Results obtained demonstrate sig
nificant differences between the biotransformation patterns of these t
wo analogues. For the aminobenzene, cytochrome P450 catalysed aromatic
hydroxylation presents the main metabolic pathway. 2,5-Difluoronitrob
enzene was predominantly metabolised through glutathione conjugation l
eading to excretion of 5-fluoro-2-(N-acetytcysteinyl)-nitrobenzene and
fluoride anions, and, to a minor extent, through cytochrome P450 cata
lysed hydroxylation and nitroreduction. Pretreatment of the rats with
various inducers of cytochrome P450 enzymes, known also to influence g
lutathione S-transferase enzyme patterns, followed by exposure to the
2,5-difluoroamino- or 2,5-difluoronitrobenzene, generally resulted in
metabolite patterns that varied only to a small (less than or equal to
12%) extent. Based on these results it was concluded that the biotran
sformation enzyme pattern is not the predominant factor in determining
the metabolic route of these two model compounds. Additional in vitro
microsomal and cytosolic incubations with 2,5-difluoroaminobenzene an
d 2,5-difluoronitrobenzene qualitatively confirmed the in vivo results
. NADPH/oxygen supported microsomal cytochrome P450 catalysed hydroxyl
ation was observed only for 2,5-difluoroaminobenzene whereas cytosolic
GSH conjugation occurred only in incubations with 2,5-difluoronitrobe
nzene as the substrate. Outcomes from molecular orbital calculations p
rovided a working hypothesis that can explain the difference in metabo
lic pathways of the nitro- and aminobenzene derivative on the basis of
their chemical characteristics. This hypothesis states that the chanc
es for a nitro- or aminobenzene derivative to enter either a cytochrom
e P450 or a glutathione conjugation pathway are determined by the rela
tive energy levels of the frontier orbitals of the compounds. The amin
obenzene derivative has relatively high energy molecular orbitals lead
ing to an efficient reaction of its highest occupied molecular orbital
(HOMO) with the singly occupied molecular orbital of the cytochrome P4
50 (FeO)(3+) intermediate, but a low reactivity of its lowest unoccupi
ed molecular orbital (LUMO) with the HOMO of glutathione. The nitroben
zene, on the other hand, has molecular orbitals of relatively low ener
gy, explaining the efficient interaction, and, thus, reaction between
its LUMO and the HOMO electrons of glutathione, but resulting in low r
eactivity with the SOMO electron of the cytochrome P450 (FeO)(3+) reac
tion intermediate.