COMPLEX SEGREGATION ANALYSIS OF LEPROSY IN SOUTHERN VIETNAM

Citation
L. Abel et al., COMPLEX SEGREGATION ANALYSIS OF LEPROSY IN SOUTHERN VIETNAM, Genetic epidemiology, 12(1), 1995, pp. 63-82
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Genetics & Heredity","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
07410395
Volume
12
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
63 - 82
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-0395(1995)12:1<63:CSAOLI>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
To investigate the nature of the genetic component controlling suscept ibility to leprosy and its subtypes, 402 nuclear families were ascerta ined through a leprosy patient followed at the Dermatology Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 285 families were of Vietnamese origin and 117 were of Chinese origin with a higher proportion of lepromatous fo rms among Chinese patients. Segregation analyses were conducted using the model developed by Abel and Bonney [(1990) Genet Epidemiol 7:391-4 07], which accounted for variable age of onset and time-dependent cova riates. Three phenotypes were considered: leprosy per se (all forms of leprosy together), nonlepromatous leprosy, and lepromatous leprosy. F or each of this phenotype, analyses were performed on the whole sample and separately on the Vietnamese and the Chinese families. The result s showed that a single Mendelian gene could not account for the famili al distributions of leprosy per se and its two subtypes in the whole s ample. However, these results were different according to the ethnic o rigin of the families. In the Vietnamese subsample, there was evidence for a codominant major gene with residual familial dependences for th e leprosy per se phenotype, and borderline rejection of the Mendelian transmission hypothesis for the nonlepromatous phenotype. In Chinese f amilies, strong rejection of Mendelian transmission was obtained in th e analysis of leprosy per se, and no evidence for a familial component in the distribution of the nonlepromatous phenotype was observed. For the lepromatous phenotype, the discrimination between models was poor , and no definitive conclusion could be reached. Referring to immunolo gical data, we suggest that these results could be explained by a hete rogeneity in the definition of the lepromatous phenotype. It is likely that progress in the understanding of the genetic components involved in the expression of leprosy will come from a better definition of th e phenotype under study, and immunological studies are ongoing in this population to investigate this hypothesis. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.