M. Blom et al., EOSINOPHILS ISOLATED WITH 2 DIFFERENT METHODS SHOW DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS OF ACTIVATION, Journal of immunological methods, 178(2), 1995, pp. 183-193
Eosinophils can be isolated from a mixed suspension of granulocytes by
different procedures. We compared functional responses of human eosin
ophils purified according to two different principles: (1) an fMLP-ind
uced difference in specific gravity between eosinophils and neutrophil
s and (2) selective removal of neutrophils by means of immunomagnetic
beads coated with CD16 mAb. The results showed that eosinophils isolat
ed with the CD16 beads method have a higher capacity to synthesize pla
telet activating factor (PAF) after stimulation with serum-treated zym
osan (STZ) than eosinophils purified with the fMLP method. Binding of
STZ and subsequent activation of the respiratory burst were also incre
ased in CD16-isolated eosinophils. Furthermore, eosinophils isolated w
ith the CD16 beads showed stronger chemotactic responses towards C5a a
nd PAF. The difference in activity of these eosinophil preparations mi
ght be explained by a loss of the more active cells during the isolati
on with the fMLP method: only 30-60% of the eosinophils were recovered
with this method, in contrast to a recovery of more than 95% with the
CD16 beads method. Indeed, this 'lost' population of eosinophils, sub
sequently purified with CD16-coated beads, had a higher respiratory bu
rst activity. The alternative explanation i.e., an enhancement of eosi
nophil function by the beads method, appeared not to be valid, because
repurification of fMLP-isolated eosinophils in the presence of fresh
neutrophils and CD16-coated beads did not change the reactivity of the
eosinophils. We conclude that the fMLP method leads to selective puri
fication of eosinophils with a resting (or 'unprimed') phenotype.