Historical and contemporary developments in feminist thinking on theor
y and method are considered. The critique of positivism is outlined, t
ogether with the affinity between feminist research and qualitative me
thods. Dilemmas are raised concerning: a false dualism between quantit
y and quality; ethical concerns; and writing in the personal. There ar
e contradictory positions within the contemporary argument for methodo
logical pluralism, such that it does not resolve tensions surrounding
issues of women's experience and the warranting of interpretations. Ep
istemological debates involving feminism and post-modernism have creat
ed a changed intellectual landscape for reconsidering the link between
qualitative research and standpoint theory. These raise issues of gro
unding, depth and evaluating knowledge by appeals to a notion of stron
g (or feminist) objectivity, together with the need to mitigate agains
t appropriation of the 'other'. Exemplars of qualitative feminist anal
ysis are presented.