Dw. Bates et al., POTENTIAL IDENTIFIABILITY AND PREVENTABILITY OF ADVERSE EVENTS USING INFORMATION-SYSTEMS, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1(5), 1994, pp. 404-411
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Information Science & Library Science","Medicine Miscellaneus","Computer Science Information Systems
Study Objective: To evaluate the potential ability of computerized inf
ormation systems (ISs) to identify and prevent adverse events in medic
al patients. Design: Clinical descriptions of all 133 adverse events i
dentified through chart review for a cohort of 3,138 medical patients
were evaluated by two reviewers. Measurements: For each adverse event,
three hierarchical levels of IS sophistication were considered: Level
1-demographics, results for all diagnostic tests, and current medicat
ions would be available on-line; Level 2-all orders would be entered o
n-line by physicians; and Level 3-additional clinical data, such as au
tomated problem lists, would be available on-line. Potential for event
identification and potential for event prevention were scored by each
reviewer according to two distinct sets of event monitors. Results: O
f all the adverse events, 53% were judged identifiable using Level 1 i
nformation, 58% were judged identifiable using Level 2 information, an
d 89% were judged identifiable using Level 3 information. The highest-
yield event monitors for identifying adverse events wee ''panic'' labo
ratory results, unexpected transfer to an intensive care unit, and hos
pital-incurred trauma. With information from Levels 1, 2, and 3, 5%, 1
3%, and 23% of the adverse events, respectively, were judged preventab
le. For preventing these adverse events, guided-dose algorithms, drug-
laboratory checks, and drug-patient characteristic checks held the mos
t potential.