Objective. This study was designed to determine whether there is an in
creased frequency of deficits in impulse control, vigilance, or both,
among child bicyclists or pedestrians who have been injured in traffic
accidents, as assessed using objective measures and parent and teache
r reports. Research design. This was a case-control study, in which ca
ses were children injured as pedestrians or bicyclists (excluding thos
e with severe head injuries) and controls were those injured as passen
gers or in some other manner in which the child's behavior was unlikel
y to be a factor. Setting. Children ages 5 to 15 years presenting to t
he emergency room of the Montreal Children's Hospital. Participants. F
or each of 286 cases, two controls were selected, making a total of 84
8 subjects. Among the eases, 172 were injured as pedestrians and 114 a
s bicyclists. Measures. Children were assessed using the Continuous Pe
rformance Task and the Delayed Response Test, both parts of a computer
ized test battery. Parents and teachers completed the Conners Abbrevia
ted Symptom Questionnaire to assess hyperactivity. Results. Cases and
controls were similar on most sociodemographic and clinical measures b
ut showed statistically significant differences in mean scores on the
Continuous Performance Task measures of omissions and commissions, poi
nting to differences in vigilance, and on the Delayed Response Test me
asures of impulsivity. Mean Conners scale scores of both parent and te
acher were significantly higher for cases than controls, and those of
parents were higher than those of teachers. Conclusions. Among childre
n whose behavior may have been a factor in the occurrence of an injury
, there is subjective evidence of increased hyperactivity and objectiv
e evidence of deficits in vigilance and attention when compared with c
losely matched controls, These findings have important implications fo
r prevention.