Ja. Kirkegaard et al., REDUCED GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT WITH CONSERVATION CROPPING .2. SOILBIOLOGICAL FACTORS LIMIT GROWTH UNDER DIRECT DRILLING, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 46(1), 1995, pp. 75-88
Wheat was grown in intact cores of soil removed from a field experimen
t in which seedlings had grown more slowly in direct-drilled soil than
in cultivated soil. Experiments were conducted in controlled environm
ents to resolve (1) whether shallower sowing of direct-drilled crops c
aused slower growth, (2) whether the soil factors causing the slower g
rowth were physical or biological and (3) if biological, whether Rhizo
ctonia solani was the major pathogen. The conditions of the experiment
s removed possible constraints of water and nutrient supply but otherw
ise simulated the environment of wheat seedlings in southern Australia
. Shallower sowing led to faster emergence and increased seedling grow
th, but irrespective of sowing depth, direct-drilled plants grew more
slowly than plants in cultivated soil. Shoot growth of direct-drilled
plants was 25-65% less than that of cultivated plants. These growth re
ductions were largely overcome by sterilizing the soil with gamma radi
ation or by fumigation with methyl bromide, indicating that biological
factors were primarily responsible. Rhizoctonia tvas implicated as th
e cause of the reduced shoot growth when infection was severe (>3 on a
0-5 scale). There was no correlation between infection severity and s
hoot growth at moderate levels (<3) and significant reductions in shoo
t growth occurred in the absence of Rhizoctonia. These reductions were
evident on the first leaf suggesting a direct influence on shoot grow
th rather than one mediated through inadequate uptake of water or nutr
ients. Infection of the germinating seed by Pythium spp. or the effect
s of phytohormones produced by inhibitory bacteria on the roots are po
ssible causes of reduced shoot growth of direct-drilled seedlings. The
dominant role of biological factors in determining plant response to
soil management indicates the need for further studies to identify the
organisms responsible, to determine the mechanism by which they influ
ence shoot growth, and the effect of management on their populations a
nd activity.