Wh. Smyth et al., OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS OF O(D-1) AND NH2 LINE-PROFILES FOR THE COMA OF COMET P HALLEY/, The Astrophysical journal, 440(1), 1995, pp. 349-360
A set of high-resolution Fabry-Perot measurements of the coma of comet
P/Halley was acquired in the [O I] 6300 Angstrom and NH2 6298.62 Angs
trom emission lines. These high-resolution measurements provide the fi
rst optical observations capable of studying directly the photochemica
l kinetics and dynamic outflow of the coma. The observations were anal
yzed by a Monte Carlo Particle Trajectory Model. The agreement of the
model and observed line profiles was excellent and verified the underl
ying dynamics, exothermic photodissociative chemistry, and collisional
thermalization in the coma. The somewhat wider intrinsic line profile
width for the O(D-1) emission in 1986 January compared to 1986 May is
, for example, produced by the larger outflow speeds and gas temperatu
res nearer perihelion in January. The January O(D-1) profile, which is
wider than the January NH2 profile, is indicative of the photochemica
l kinetics in the dissociation of the parent molecules H2O and OH in t
he coma. The absolute calibration of the observations in 1986 January
allowed the production rates for H2O and the NH2-parent molecules to b
e determined. The average daily water production rates derived from th
e O(D-1) emission data for January 16 and 17 are (2.90+/-0.13) x 10(30
) molecules s(-1) and (2.68 +/- 0.38) x 10(30) molecules s(-1), respec
tively. These very large water production rates are consistent with th
e extrapolated (and 7.6 day time variable) water production rates dete
rmined from the analysis of lower spectral resolution observations for
O(D-1) and Ha emissions (Smyth et al. 1993) that covered the time per
iod up to January 13. The large production rates on January 16 and 17
establish that the maximum water production rate for comet Halley occu
rred pre-perihelion in January. Implications drawn from comparison wit
h 18 cm radio emission data in January suggest that the peak water pro
duction rate was even larger and might have been as large as similar t
o 3.6 x 10(30) molecules s(-1) near January 23. The average production
rate for NH, determined from the NH2 emission data for January 17 was
(1.48 +/- 0.10) x 10(28) molecules s(-1), yielding an NH3/H2O product
ion rate ratio of 0.55%. This ratio is consistent with the range of ea
rlier derived values. The corrected g-value noted in the NH2 analysis
brings most NH2 production rates in line with NH production rates and
also makes them consistent with the production of both species from NH
3.