Since its inception in the years following World War II, the green rev
olution has been defended, not just as a technical program designed to
alleviate world hunger, but on moral grounds as a program to achieve
world peace. In this paper, I dispute the moral claim to a politics of
peace, arguing instead that the green revolution is warist in its tre
atment of the environment and indigenous communities, and that the agr
icultural practices that the green revolution was designed to supplant
-principally indigenous women's agriculture-are forms of ecological pe
acemaking, akin to pacifism. I argue, as well, that the warist intenti
ons of the green revolution are characteristic of a form of domination
called developmentalism. A complete understanding of domination neces
sitates linking developmentalism with other forms of domination such a
s racism, sexism, and naturism.