PREPARATION, FLUXIONALITY AND SOME REACTIONS OF RING-LINKED [FE-2(ETA,ETA-C5H4-A-B-C5H4)(CO)(4-N)(CNME)(N)] COMPLEXES

[Fe-2{eta,eta-C5H4-A-B-C5H4}(CO)(2)(mu-CO)(2)] reacts with CNMe in ref luxing xylene when A-B = R,S-CH(NMe(2))CH(NMe(2)) or CH2C(O) to give [ Fe-2{eta,eta-C5H4-A-B-C5H4}(CO)(4-n)(CNMe)(n)] (n = 1 or 2). This ther mal reaction does not take place when A-B = R,R/S,S-CH(NMe(2))CH(NMe(2 )), CH2CH(NMe(2)), CHC(NMe(2)), CH2CH(OH) or CH2CH2, but photolysis al lows the preparation of [Fe-2{eta,eta-C5H4-A-B-C5H4}(CO)(4-n)(CNMe)(n) ] (n = 1-3), and [Fe-2{eta,eta-C5H4CH2CH(OH)C5H4}(CO)(3)(CNMe)] may be prepared by the LiAlH4-reduction of [Fe-2{eta,eta-C5H4CH2C(O)C5H4}(CO )(3)(CNMe)]. All the complexes react with MeI, EtI or MeOSO(2)CF(3) to give derivatives containing one or two mu-CNMe(2)(+) ligands. H-1 NMR studies show that all the neutral complexes are fluxional, with proce sses taking place within the C5H4-A-B-C5H4 ligands comparable to those observed in the tetracarbonyl precursors as well as CO/CNMe site exch ange. This last is more restricted than in the [Fe-2(eta-C5H5)(2)(CO)( 4-n)(CNMe)(n)] counterparts, so that two non-interconverting [Fe-2{eta ,eta-C5H4-A-B-C5H4}(CO)(2)(CNMe)(2)] species are possible, and have be en separated in most instances; one has the structure {eta,eta-C5H4-A- B-C5H4}(CO)(CNMe)(mu-CO)(mu-CNMe)] and the other is [Fe-2{eta,eta-C5H4 -A-B-C5H4}(CO)(2)(mu-CNMe)(2)], which is in equilibrium with [Fe-2{eta ,eta-C5H4-A-B-C5H4}(CNMe)(2)(mu-CO)(2)] in solution. Their formation p rovides unequivocal evidence for the validity of the Cotton-Adams rule s on fluxionality in [Fe-2(eta-C5H5)(2)(CO)(4)] derivatives. The struc ture of -C5H4CH(NMe(2))CH(NMe(2))C5H4}(CO)(2)(mu-CNMe)(2)] has been de termined by an X-ray diffraction study.