Jw. Peabody et al., HEALTH FOR ALL IN THE REPUBLIC-OF-KOREA - ONE COUNTRY EXPERIENCE WITHIMPLEMENTING UNIVERSAL HEALTH-CARE, Health policy, 31(1), 1995, pp. 29-42
Health care reforms in many countries face the twin challenges of prov
iding universal coverage while controlling spiraling costs. Sixteen ye
ars ago the Republic of Korea had no national plan for health insuranc
e, and only 8.8% of the population was covered. In 1975, health care a
ccounted for 2.8% of GDP with government providing 12% of the finances
. In 1977, Korea adopted a policy designed to achieve universal covera
ge while maintaining fee-for-service reimbursement. Korea incrementall
y established an employer based health care scheme by first mandating
coverage for businesses, then government employees and teachers. Cover
age was later extended to the poor, the self-employed, and residents o
f rural areas. Independent insurance societies manage each scheme, set
premiums and co-payments, and are responsible for maintaining financi
al viability. By 1991, 30% of Korea's health care expenditures were fr
om public funds, and health care costs had risen to 7.1% of GDP. Healt
h care reform in Korea has been successful in achieving universal cove
rage, providing for a full range of services, and eliminating adverse
selection. The system is financially solvent, costs are equitably dist
ributed with the government providing subsidies when necessary, and sm
all businesses have not been unduly burdened economically. Attempts to
limit costs, however, have been unsuccessful. Patient demand for heal
th care has remained surprisingly resistant to increasing co-payments.
Providers have responded to lower physician and hospital fees by prov
iding shorter, more frequent patient visits, relabeling services, and
increasing hospital admissions. Competition between insurance societie
s has not materialized in a meaningful way to control costs.