The radiologic report records all of the important steps taken in the
practice of radiology and should be evaluated with special interest. T
he literature reflects the subjectivity inherent to a field left to pe
rsonal interpretation, and few prospective studies of radiologic repor
ting are available. To determine the characteristics of the ideal radi
ologic report, the authors held workshops with two groups of radiologi
sts and residents in radiology. The following items (in order of prior
ity) were considered of prime importance by the participants and are d
iscussed here: expression of an opinion and presentation of a workable
differential diagnosis; an answer to the referring physician's questi
on; a list of the limitations of the examination, if any; open-ended r
ecommendations to the referring physician; integration of the findings
with the clinical context; a synthesis of the findings obtained with
various imaging modalities, when pertinent; and a complete description
of the findings. The radiologic report has been compared to a scienti
fic paper, and this comparison suggests the format for bringing these
items together. The resulting realistic blueprint for the ideal radiol
ogic report can be tailored to fit every imaging situation. Moreover,
it can be a useful tool for evaluating the whole imaging process.