Jn. Oshinski et al., TURBULENT FLUCTUATION VELOCITY - THE MOST SIGNIFICANT DETERMINANT OF SIGNAL LOSS IN STENOTIC VESSELS, Magnetic resonance in medicine, 33(2), 1995, pp. 193-199
Studies of flow in a 90%-stenosis phantom were conducted to elucidate
the parameters and mechanisms responsible for signal loss in MR angiog
raphic images. The studies independently evaluated the effect of veloc
ity, Reynolds number, turbulent fluctuation velocity, and turbulence i
ntensity on the amount of post-stenotic signal loss. Results suggested
that the magnitude of the turbulent fluctuation velocity, not merely
the presenceof turbulence or the intensity of turbulence, was the para
meter that determined the extent of the signal loss. The study suggest
s that future flow phantom studies should be conducted with fluids hav
ing physiologic velocities and viscosities to obtain accurate levels o
f turbulent fluctuation velocities and hence reproduce results of in-v
ivo signal-loss patterns. The mechanism for signal loss is that the te
mporal and spatial variations of the turbulent fluctuation velocity ca
use a range of phases to be present within a voxel. Examination of the
theoretical aspects of fluid turbulence suggest that shortening gradi
ent durations and imaging during diastole may help reduce signal loss.