PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS OF ALTERNATIVE, LOW-COST ABSORBENTS FOR OPEN-CYCLE ABSORPTION SOLAR COOLING

Citation
Ta. Ameel et al., PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS OF ALTERNATIVE, LOW-COST ABSORBENTS FOR OPEN-CYCLE ABSORPTION SOLAR COOLING, Solar energy, 54(2), 1995, pp. 65-73
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Energy & Fuels
Journal title
ISSN journal
0038092X
Volume
54
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
65 - 73
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-092X(1995)54:2<65:PPOALA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
To achieve solar fractions greater than 0.90 using the open-cycle abso rption refrigeration system, considerable sorbent solution storage is necessary. Sorbent solutions currently under consideration, such as aq ueous solutions of lithium chloride and lithium bromide, may be too co stly to exploit the open-cycle storage concept. Having identified the absorber as the system component whose performance is affected the mos t by a change in absorbent, an absorber model was selected from availa ble literature pertaining to simultaneous heat and mass transfer. Low cost absorbent candidates were selected and their physical properties were either located in the literature, measured, or estimated. Absorbe r operating parameters were selected and the model was then used to es timate absorber performance for each absorbent in terms of cooling cap acity per unit of absorber area. After specifying system parameters su ch as absorber capacity and cooling load, the absorber area, absorbent cost; and sorbent solution pumping power and storage volume were esti mated for each candidate. The most promising of the absorbents conside red was a mixture of two parts lithium chloride and one part zinc chlo ride. The estimated capacities per unit absorber area were 50-70% less than those of lithium bromide; however, the lithium bromide cost for a system sized to cool a 190 m(2) residential structure was estimated to be eight times that for the lithium-zinc chloride mixture. Both the lithium-zinc chloride mixture and lithium bromide solutions had estim ated pumping powers of less than 0.1 kW. The solubility of the lithium -zinc chloride mixture at absorber conditions was improved over that o f lithium bromide, reducing the risk of solidification of the solution .