Background. TNM staging of gastroesophageal cancer is improved by the
use of laparoscopy for the detection of occult metastases and endoscop
ic ultrasonography for T and possibly N staging. Laparoscopic ultrason
ography may combine the strengths of both of these techniques. The pur
pose of this study was to compare TNM staging by means of laparoscopic
ultrasonography (Lap US), laparoscopy, and conventional computed tomo
graphy (CT). Methods. TNM stage was determined by using Lap US, laparo
scopy, and CT scanning in 26 surgical candidates with gastric or esoph
ageal cancer in a blinded fashion. CT scans were also reviewed separat
ely by an expert radiologist. Validation of findings was by means of f
inal pathologic examination. Results. Resectability for potential cure
was determined by means of Lap US with a sensitivity of 100% and spec
ificity of 91% versus 100% and 73% for laparoscopy and 75% and 60% for
CT, respectively. Overall TNM staging was 82% accurate for Lap US ver
sus 67% for laparoscopy and 47% for CT (chi-squared, 8.64, p < 0.005,
and 10.4, p < 0.005, respectively). Accuracies for Lap US versus lapar
oscopy versus CT for N stage were 92% versus 84% versus 70%, respectiv
ely, for T stage were 92% versus 42% versus 60%, respectively, and for
M stage were 89% versus 44% vers rcs 62%, respectively. Conclusions.
T and N staging by Lap US were comparable to published results for end
oscopic ultrasonography, and overall TNM staging was better. Lap US ma
y provide the optimal preoperative staging for gastric cancer and has
the potential to complement endoscopic ultrasonography in staging esop
hageal cancer.