DETECTING DELIRIUM AMONG HOSPITALIZED OLDER PATIENTS

Citation
P. Pompei et al., DETECTING DELIRIUM AMONG HOSPITALIZED OLDER PATIENTS, Archives of internal medicine, 155(3), 1995, pp. 301-307
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00039926
Volume
155
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
301 - 307
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9926(1995)155:3<301:DDAHOP>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Background: Delirium occurs commonly among older hospitalized patients and is frequently not recognized. In an effort to identify tools usef ul to clinicians in the diagnosis of delirium, test characteristics of four screening instruments were compared. Methods: Patients 65 years of age or older who were admitted to one of four medical and surgical wards of a university teaching hospital were followed up prospectively . Potential subjects were excluded if unavailable for interviews or di scharged within 48 hours of admission, or if judged too impaired to pa rticipate in the daily interviews. Research assistants administered fo ur instruments used to detect delirium: Digit Span Test, Vigilance 'A' Test, Clinical Assessment of Confusion, and Confusion Assessment Meth od. Abnormal scores on these tests or suspicion of acute confusion pro mpted a referral to the clinician-investigators who then assessed the patient daily for delirium based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Man ual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition criteria. Results: Deli rium occurred in 64 (14.8%) of 432 subjects. The positive likelihood r atios for all of the instruments were significantly more than 1. The i nstruments remained useful when applied to selected subgroups: subject s in whom acute mental status changes were documented, subjects on sur gical services, and subjects with impaired cognitive status on admissi on. Combinations of any two instruments did not perform substantially better than the instrument with the best test characteristics: the Cli nical Assessment of Confusion. All instruments were more useful at con firming delirium than in excluding it. Conclusion: The four instrument s studied, which are suitable for use at the bedside, can aid the clin ician in identifying patients likely to be suffering from delirium.