The project upon which this paper is based is a qualitative study of t
he supervision [thesis advising]1 of research students [graduate stude
nts] in departments of education and psychology in three British unive
rsities. Two models are apparent in the literature of supervision. The
technical rationality model gives priority to issues of procedure or
technique, while the negotiated order model conceptualizes supervision
as a process open to negotiation and change. We look at supervisory s
tyle, reporting findings on the nature of tutorials [meetings] between
supervisor and student, the extent of direction given by the supervis
or to the project, and the nature of the interpersonal relationship be
tween the parties. We also consider student strategies. Our findings s
uggest that although the technical rationality model has much to recom
mend it, a negotiated order model is a better description of what happ
ens in practice.