Previous studies that have examined the psychosocial adjustment of chi
ldren with short stature have often been flawed, for two main reasons:
first, a lack of sample homogeneity and, secondly, the measures of ad
justment used have been limited in terms of their sensitivity. This pa
per examines psychological functioning in the following four broad are
as: cognition, social behaviour, emotional adjustment and self-concept
. A sample of children referred to growth clinics (mean height below -
2 SDS) and a comparison group, recruited from the referred childrens'
classes at school, were assessed. Children were prepubertal (age range
, 6-11 years) and had no organic cause for their short stature. Parent
, teacher and peer reports were used in the assessment, which included
sociometric measures in the classroom. The children with short statur
e described themselves as equally well supported as the comparison chi
ldren in terms of social support by parents, teachers, peers and frien
ds. Peers reported the short children to be well accepted within their
class. Compared with control children, there was a trend for short ch
ildren to be described by their peers as socially better adjusted than
average. Teacher and parental accounts revealed significant group dif
ferences in terms of reported behaviour, with poorer attention and mor
e thought problems among the children with short stature. Further anal
ysis suggested, however, that their slightly lower IQ than children of
normal height (95.8 +/- 18.7 (mean +/- SD) compared with 105 +/- 15.4
) accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in these findings
than short stature per se. There is little evidence to indicate that
short prepubertal children are psychosocially maladjusted. Their acade
mic performance was poorer than expected on the basis of their cogniti
ve abilities. Reports of immature and impulsive behaviour may not be a
pplicable to a sample of children not referred to a growth clinic.