Two examples are presented of the application of in situ structure and
composition sensitive techniques to elucidating the nature of the ele
ctrode-electrolyte interface. One case is the underpotentially deposit
ed submonolayer of Cu on Au(111). Despite extensive electrochemical, L
EED, RHEED, STM, AFM, and EXAFS investigations, the structure of the c
opper adlayer is still controversial. In situ surface EXAFS, surface X
-ray scattering, and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) data lead to th
e conclusion that the adlayer adopts a (root 3 x root 3)R30 degrees he
xagonal honeycomb arrangement of Cu atoms in which the Cu coverage is
2/3 and the sulfate coverage 1/3. The other case is the structure of w
ater at the Ag(111)-aqueous sodium fluoride interface. Analysis of X-r
ay scattering shows that the interfacial water molecules exhibit poten
tial dependent layering and reorientation and a markedly increased den
sity (twice bulk water) in the inner layer.