G. Herrmann et al., PSEUDO-STENOSIS BY VESSEL WALL INVAGINATI ON DURING INTERVENTIONAL THERAPY OF 2 CORONARY-ARTERIES IN ONE PATIENT, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 84(1), 1995, pp. 30-34
We report on a 59-year-old man who underwent a combined procedure of d
irectional coronary atherectomy (DCA) and PTCA of significant lesions
of the right coronary artery (RCA) and the left circumflex artery (LCX
). Already after positioning of a standard guide wire in the right cor
onary artery a new excentric ''pseudo-stenosis'' was observed in the p
roximal part of the right coronary artery. Since the patient remained
symptom free, a 7F DCA catheter was introduced to the stenotic area in
the mid RCA, which led to an extension of the narrowing, involving th
e total segment proximal to the DCA catheter. Directional coronary ath
erectomy was performed without complications. Removal of the catheter,
after successful DCA, and administration of intracoronary nitroglycer
in did not relieve the proximal narrowing, which disappeared spontaneo
usly after the guide wire was pulled out. During PTCA of the left circ
umflex using a standard guide wire and a 3.0 mm Monorail balloon cathe
ter, a similar tight narrowing of the origin of the LCX was observed,
which could also not be influenced by vasodilator drugs, but relieved
after wire removal. Until now, this phenomenon has only been described
for the right coronary artery. The reason underlying intimal folding
is a shifting of the intimal layer against the medial layer of the ves
sel wall. Our observation firstly describes this phenomenon of ''pseud
o narrowing'' in two different vessels in one patient. We, like other
authors before, recommend that interventional therapy of these pseudo-
lesions should be avoided.