Lc. Kilgore et al., ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE ENDOMETRIUM - SURVIVAL COMPARISONS OF PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT PELVIC NODE SAMPLING, Gynecologic oncology, 56(1), 1995, pp. 29-33
From 1969 to 1990, 649 patients with adenocarcinoma of the endometrium
were surgically managed by gynecologic oncologists from the Universit
y of Alabama at Birmingham. All patients underwent TAH-BSO and washing
s. Two hundred twelve patients had multiple-site pelvic node sampling
(mean number of nodes, 11), 205 patients had limited site pelvic node
sampling (mean number of nodes, 4), and in 208 patients, nodes were no
t sampled. Historical prognostic features, including tumor grade, dept
h of invasion, adnexal metastasis, cervical involvement, and positive
cytology, were equally distributed in the three groups. Mean follow-up
was 3 years. Patients undergoing multiple-site pelvic node sampling h
ad significantly better survival than patients without node sampling (
P = 0.0002). When patients were categorized as low risk (disease confi
ned to the corpus) or as high risk (disease in the cervix, adnexa, ute
rine serosa, or washings) multiple-site pelvic node sampling again pro
vided a significant survival advantage compared to patients without no
de sampling (high risk, P = 0.0006; low risk, P = 0.026). In a compari
son of patients receiving whole pelvic radiation for grade III lesions
or deep myometrial invasion, patients with multiple-site pelvic node
sampling had better survival than those in whome nodes were not sample
d (P = 0.0027). The significant survival advantage for patients having
multiple-site node sampling, overall and in high- and low-risk groups
, strongly suggests a therapeutic benefit. Additionally, adjuvant ther
apy may be more appropriately directed in these patients. (C) 1995 Aca
demic Press, Inc.