The consequences of different crop successions on foot and root diseas
es were analysed on a subsequent winter wheat crop managed identically
, regardless of crop succession. At flowering, tillers and roots were
assessed for eyespot (Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides), take-all (
Gaeumannomyces graminis var tritici) and sharp eyespot (Rhizoctonia ce
realis). As a consequence, we can propose a simple model of the effect
of the preceding crop and the I before that on the 3 diseases. This m
odel is based on a crop classification into 3 groups: host, amplifying
crop and non-host for take-all and sharp eyespot; and 'strong/weak' h
ost, amplifying crop and non-host for eyespot. Whereas host crops tend
to increase and non-host crops to decrease disease risk, amplifying c
rops (maize, ryegrass, etc) can only increase risk if they are associa
ted with host crops.