Cr. Morris et al., SEROEPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF NATURAL TRANSMISSION OF MYCOPLASMA-HYOPNEUMONIAE IN A SWINE HERD, Preventive veterinary medicine, 21(4), 1995, pp. 323-337
A cohort of 57 pigs in a farrow-to-finish swine herd with mild clinica
l mycoplasmal disease was followed to determine patterns of seroconver
sion to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (MH), detected with an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Survival analysis was used to evaluate th
e relationship between time to seroconversion and possible risk factor
s for MH infection (or enzootic pneumonia). Pigs were housed in outdoo
r pens at approximately 9 weeks of age, when passively acquired MH ant
ibodies had decayed. From 9 to 11 weeks of age and during a 5 week per
iod, pigs were exposed by direct (nose-to-nose) or indirect contact to
older seropositive gilts. Blood samples were collected from each pig
at 3 week intervals until market age, when they were either slaughtere
d or selected for breeding. Antibody concentration was measured as the
ratio of optical densities of the serum sample to the positive contro
l (S/P). Based on the sample distribution of S/P ratios from pigs in a
n MH-free herd, pigs were considered positive when S/P ratios were gre
ater than 0.34. At the beginning of the study, all pigs were seronegat
ive to MH. Seroconversion was first detected after 21 days, and was mo
st frequent about 11 weeks after exposure to older seropositive gilts.
By the end of the study, 11 pigs (19%) had seroconverted, with S/P ra
tios ranging from 0.40 to 1.11. The presence of gross lung lesions sho
wed a moderate to good agreement with ELISA results (kappa = 0.62). Hi
stologic lesions were evident in virtually all slaughtered pigs, rangi
ng from mild, non MH-specific lesions to severe lesions typical of MH
infection. No secondary respiratory pathogens were isolated. Clinical
signs were mild and there was no significant difference (P > 0.4) in w
eight gain between seropositive and seronegative pigs, or between pigs
with and without lung lesions. A Cox regression model was fitted to t
he seroconversion data, and opportunity of contact (direct or indirect
) was the only significant variable. After adjustment for breed and an
tibody S/P ratio prior to exposure, pigs in direct contact with seropo
sitive gilts were seven times more likely to seroconvert than those in
only indirect contact.