Jm. Reynard et al., THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ABDOMINAL STRAINING IN MEN WITH LOWER URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS, British Journal of Urology, 75(2), 1995, pp. 148-153
Objective To determine the relationship between the symptom of straini
ng to void, the presence of objectively demonstrated abdominal straini
ng and bladder outflow obstruction in men with lower urinary tract sym
ptoms (LUTS), and to assess the effect of straining on now rate in the
se men. Patients and methods The presence of straining to void as a sy
mptom was determined from a symptom questionnaire in 61 men presenting
with LUTS. Objective evidence of straining to void was assessed by re
ctal pressure measurement and the presence of bladder outflow obstruct
ion was determined by pressure-now studies. The effect of straining on
now rate was assessed in a separate group of 58 men with LUTS, by com
paring the maximum now rate on non-strain and strain voids of similar
volume. Results There was poor agreement between the complaint of stra
ining and the presence of straining as measured by rectal pressure rec
ording. Twelve of the 53 patients who claimed they never or occasional
ly strained to void in fact showed straining on each of four voids. Th
ere was no significant difference in the proportion of men who complai
ned of straining in the obstructed and non-obstructed groups (P=0.86).
The probability of obstruction in those men with objective evidence o
f straining on all voids was 80% and in those who did not strain on al
l voids was 51%, but this difference was not statistically significant
(P=0.53). There was no clinically significant effect of straining on
maximum now rate in men with LUTS. Conclusion As a symptom, straining
is an uncommon complaint in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH
), and the relationship between the symptom and objective evidence of
its presence is poor. Both as a symptom and as an objectively measured
voiding disorder, straining lacks sufficient sensitivity and specific
ity for it to be of value in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstructi
on (BOG). Abdominal straining does not have a marked effect on now rat
e in men with BPH. This study suggests that straining is an unreliable
symptom of BOG, that it does not influence voiding function in elderl
y men and that its inclusion in symptom scores for BPH should be recon
sidered.