THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ABDOMINAL STRAINING IN MEN WITH LOWER URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS

Citation
Jm. Reynard et al., THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ABDOMINAL STRAINING IN MEN WITH LOWER URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS, British Journal of Urology, 75(2), 1995, pp. 148-153
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00071331
Volume
75
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
148 - 153
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1331(1995)75:2<148:TSOASI>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Objective To determine the relationship between the symptom of straini ng to void, the presence of objectively demonstrated abdominal straini ng and bladder outflow obstruction in men with lower urinary tract sym ptoms (LUTS), and to assess the effect of straining on now rate in the se men. Patients and methods The presence of straining to void as a sy mptom was determined from a symptom questionnaire in 61 men presenting with LUTS. Objective evidence of straining to void was assessed by re ctal pressure measurement and the presence of bladder outflow obstruct ion was determined by pressure-now studies. The effect of straining on now rate was assessed in a separate group of 58 men with LUTS, by com paring the maximum now rate on non-strain and strain voids of similar volume. Results There was poor agreement between the complaint of stra ining and the presence of straining as measured by rectal pressure rec ording. Twelve of the 53 patients who claimed they never or occasional ly strained to void in fact showed straining on each of four voids. Th ere was no significant difference in the proportion of men who complai ned of straining in the obstructed and non-obstructed groups (P=0.86). The probability of obstruction in those men with objective evidence o f straining on all voids was 80% and in those who did not strain on al l voids was 51%, but this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.53). There was no clinically significant effect of straining on maximum now rate in men with LUTS. Conclusion As a symptom, straining is an uncommon complaint in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH ), and the relationship between the symptom and objective evidence of its presence is poor. Both as a symptom and as an objectively measured voiding disorder, straining lacks sufficient sensitivity and specific ity for it to be of value in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstructi on (BOG). Abdominal straining does not have a marked effect on now rat e in men with BPH. This study suggests that straining is an unreliable symptom of BOG, that it does not influence voiding function in elderl y men and that its inclusion in symptom scores for BPH should be recon sidered.