COMPARISON OF 24 DIFFERENT ADJUVANTS FOR INACTIVATED HIV-2 SPLIT WHOLE VIRUS AS ANTIGEN IN MICE - INDUCTION OF TITERS OF BINDING-ANTIBODIESAND TOXICITY OF THE FORMULATIONS

Citation
F. Stieneker et al., COMPARISON OF 24 DIFFERENT ADJUVANTS FOR INACTIVATED HIV-2 SPLIT WHOLE VIRUS AS ANTIGEN IN MICE - INDUCTION OF TITERS OF BINDING-ANTIBODIESAND TOXICITY OF THE FORMULATIONS, Vaccine, 13(1), 1995, pp. 45-53
Citations number
78
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
ISSN journal
0264410X
Volume
13
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
45 - 53
Database
ISI
SICI code
0264-410X(1995)13:1<45:CO2DAF>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
The objective of this study was the comparison of the quantity and qua lity of the humoral immune response against inactivated whole human im munodeficiency virus type 2. Twenty-four different adjuvants were test ed. The toxicity of these preparations was determined. Due to the larg e number of experiments, the animal model used was the NMRI mouse. Ser a were assayed for the presence of antibodies by ELISA and Western blo t, The toxicity of the adjuvants was determined by observing lethal si de-effects occurring within two days after injection of the immunogeni c preparations, The results show that polymethylmethacrylate nanoparti cles were the best overall adjuvant, inducing the highest titres of an tibodies compared with other adjuvants as well as producing a signific antly better immune response against a number of individual HIV-2 anti gens without any observable toxic side-effects, However, this adjuvant did not induce antibodies against the outer envelope protein gp120, w hereas such antibodies were induced by aluminium compounds, Freund's c omplete and incomplete adjuvants, and fumed silica (Aerosil). This res ult suggests the necessity of using vaccines with two or more differen t adjuvants in order to induce the required immune response against ph ysically different antigens.