Ilc. Chapple et al., CALIBRATION AND RELIABILITY OF THE PERIOTRON-6000 FOR INDIVIDUAL GINGIVAL CREVICULAR FLUID SAMPLES, Journal of Periodontal Research, 30(1), 1995, pp. 73-79
The Periotron 6000(R) fluid analyser has become widely used as a diagn
ostic tool for a variety of oral diseases and recent work has question
ed its reliability. This paper investigates for the first time, the de
tailed calibration curves of 2 Periotron 6000 machines across a range
of 23 different fluid volumes. Within and between machine reliability
is analyzed and the shape of the calibration line determined. The meas
urement errors incurred by using a single fluid sample, as opposed to
mean values of triplicate samples are also determined. We conclude tha
t there are 3 sections to the calibration line, 2 linear and a quadril
ateral zone, and that 2 separate regression equations should be used;
from 0-0.1 mu l and from 0.1-1.0 mu l. Within machine calibration erro
rs were only 3.2 +/- 7.5%, but values for volumes below 0.2 mu l were
as high as 18.7%. Using a single fluid sample rather than mean values
of multiple samples, incurred a further 4 +/- 4% error, which was as h
igh as 7% for volumes lower than 0.12 mu l. Whilst significant differe
nces in volume reading existed between different machines (p<0.0004) a
nd between the same volumes of different fluids (p<0.00001), individua
l Periotron calibrations were extremely reproducible and reliable. We
conclude that the Periotron 6000 is a reliable and convenient instrume
nt for measuring fluid volumes greater than 0.2 mu l. For volumes lowe
r than 0.2 mu l errors in measurement may be too high for some investi
gations, but this is likely to be due to problems with evaporation and
with measurement technique, rather than errors directly due to the Pe
riotron itself. Finally, for optimum accuracy, the digital display sho
uld be re-set to zero after each sample is measured.