This paper presents an economic analysis of the incremental benefits a
nd costs of clean water programs. Benefit estimates are principally ba
sed on contingent valuation research on willingness to pay for clean f
reshwater. These data are supplemented with estimated benefits for mun
icipal and industrial water withdrawals and saltwater fishing. Cost es
timates are largely based on Environmental Protection Agency ''needs''
data and on studies of nonpoint source pollution control practices. T
he analysis suggests that Clean Water Act programs, as currently plann
ed, may have incremental costs that exceed their incremental benefits.
Several alternative scenarios, with different benefit and cost assump
tions, support this conclusion. Importantly, the policy options examin
ed in this study generally are not the least cost approach for attaini
ng water quality goals. The analysis suggests that the focus on munici
pal treatment facilities, as opposed to nonpoint source practices, is
unlikely to be cost effective as a national strategy. The analysis als
o suggests that the concept of ''needs'' has limitations when viewed i
n a benefit-cost context. Finally, better information linking planned
expenditures (costs) to expected ambient quality improvements (benefit
s) appears necessary to plan efficient programs.