T. Hortobagyi et al., GREATER CROSS EDUCATION FOLLOWING TRAINING WITH MUSCLE LENGTHENING THAN SHORTENING, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 29(1), 1997, pp. 107-112
The hypothesis was tested that the magnitude of cross education is gre
ater following training with muscle lengthening than shortening. Chang
es in contralateral concentric, eccentric, and isometric strength and
vastus lateralis and biceps femoris surface electromyographic (EMG) ac
tivity were analyzed in groups of young men who exercised the ipsilate
ral quadriceps with either eccentric (N = 7) or concentric (N = 8) con
tractions for 36 sessions over 12 wk. Control subjects (N = 6) did not
train. Concentric training increased concentric strength 30% and isom
etric strength 22%, and eccentric training increased eccentric strengt
h 77% and isometric strength 39% (all P < 0.05). Eccentric training im
proved eccentric strength three times more than the concentric trainin
g improved concentric strength (P < 0.05), and eccentric compared with
concentric training improved isometric strength about 2 times more (P
< 0.05). The eccentric group improved significantly from pre- to mid-
training in eccentric and isometric strength (P < 0.05). The control g
roup showed no significant changes (P < 0.05). Surface EMG activity of
the vastus lateralis increased 2.2 times (pre to mid-training), 2.8 (
mid- to post-training) and 2.6 more (pre- to posttraining) (P < 0.05)
in the eccentric than concentric group. No significant changes in EMG
activity occurred in the control group (P > 0.05). It was concluded th
at the greater cross education following training with muscle lengthen
ing is most likely being mediated by both afferent and efferent mechan
isms that allow previously sedentary subjects to achieve a greater act
ivation of the untrained limb musculature.