E. Bergers et al., REPRODUCIBILITY OF SEMIAUTOMATED CELL-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF FLOW CYTOMETRIC DNA HISTOGRAMS OF FRESH BREAST-CANCER MATERIAL, Analytical cellular pathology, 8(1), 1995, pp. 1-13
DNA-variables such as DNA-ploidy, DNA-index and %S-phase cells have be
en proven to have prognostic value for breast cancer patients. These v
ariables can be obtained by interpreting DNA-histograms by cell cycle
analysis. Since there are a number of potential error sources, the aim
of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reproduc
ibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis with the emphasis on DNA
ploidy and %S-phase assessments. The 149 DNA-histograms we used were
randomly selected from the Multicentre Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma
Project, a nationwide prospective study in The Netherlands on the repr
oducibility and prognostic power of quantitative assessments. These DN
A-histograms were obtained by flow cytometry of fresh frozen breast ca
ncer material. Cell cycle analysis was performed according to a strict
protocol with the semi-automated computer program 'MultiCycle', using
the background correction option; 68 histograms were analyzed in dupl
icate by the same observer, and 81 histograms were analyzed by two obs
ervers. Assessment of DNA-ploidy showed an intra-observer concordance
of 99% (kappa-value 0.98) and an inter-observer concordance of 94% (ka
ppa-value 0.91). The disagreement could be attributed to overlooking a
DNA-tetraploid cell cycle in one case, some difficult histograms and
varying opinions about small peaks between the observers in a few case
s. Intra-observer %S-phase correlation coefficients varied between 0.7
2 for the %S-phase of the second aneuploid cell cycle and 0.99 for the
%S-phase of the diploid cell cycle. Inter-observer correlation coeffi
cients varied between 0.81 for the %S-phase of the second cell cycle a
nd 0.95 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle and the average %S-
phase cells. As for DNA-index, intra- and interobserver correlation co
efficients were 0.97 and 0.94, respectively. In conclusion, intra- and
inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis
of flow cytometric DNA-histograms from fresh breast cancer material us
ing the MultiCycle program, following a strict protocol, is in princip
le high. The results of this study may help us to decide which of the
different %S-phases provided by cell cycle analysis software should be
used in daily practice.