K. Tuovinen et al., PHOSPHOTRIESTERASE, PRALIDOXIME-2-CHLORIDE (2-PAM) AND EPTASTIGMINE TREATMENTS AND THEIR COMBINATIONS IN DFP INTOXICATION, Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 141(2), 1996, pp. 555-560
The protective action of i.v. administered eptastigmine, an organophos
phate hydrolase (phosphotriesterase), or pralidoxime-2-chloride (2-PAM
) and their combination in acute diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) into
xication were evaluated in mice. The mice received the physostigmine d
erivative, eptastigmine (0.9 mg/kg body wt, i.v.), 10 min prior to the
i.p. injection of DFP (1.8 mg/kg body wt). Phosphotriesterase (66 mu
mol/min x ml/g and 6 mu g/g body wt) or 2-PAM (30 mg/kg body wt) were
given i.v. 30 min after DFP. The animals also received atropine sc (37
.5 mg/kg body wt) immediately after DFP. The cholinesterase (ChE) acti
vities were not protected or reactivated by 2-PAM alone. The ChE activ
ities in brain and plasma were protected by phosphotriesterase. Eptast
igmine alone assisted the recovery of the brain ChE activities. Also t
he combination of eptastigmine-phosphotriesterase protected the brain
enzymes. It did not, however, provide any additional protection compar
ed with phosphotriesterase-treatment on its own. In brain, the combina
tion of eptastigmine with 2-PAM resulted in partly restored enzyme act
ivities 24 hr after DFP exposure. In plasma, eptastigmine did not prev
ent the inhibition of ChE by DFP. However, when it was combined with p
hosphotriesterase, it significantly promoted the recovery of plasma Ch
E activity. In lung and in erythrocytes, the various combinations of a
ntidotes caused only minor changes in the ChE activities. (C) 1996 Aca
demic Press, Inc.