B. Debruyne et al., RATIONALE AND APPLICATION OF CORONARY TRANSSTENOTIC PRESSURE-GRADIENTMEASUREMENTS, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis, 33(3), 1994, pp. 250-261
Presence, extent, and evolution of atherosclerotic coronary narrowings
, as well as the anatomic possibilities for revascularization, can be
reliably defined at (and only at) selective coronary angiography. The
latter remains, therefore, the pivotal diagnostic tool for patients wi
th suspected coronary artery disease. However, in spite of the increas
ing availability of on-line quantitative coronary angiography, it stil
l holds that the functional (physiologic) consequences of an epicardia
l coronary narrowing cannot be completely derived from geometric (anat
omic) information. Clinical decision making can be particularly diffic
ult in lesions of intermediate severity (40-70% diameter reduction), i
n postinterventional segments, and in some particular anatomic setting
s, namely, ostial stenoses, bifurcation lesions, and diffuse atheroscl
erotic disease. This has led to an explosive growth of new methods for
assessing the physiological significance of coronary narrowings docum
ented at angiography. Among them, Doppler blood flow velocitometry and
transstenotic pressure gradient measurements have emerged as the only
techniques easily applicable in most catheterization laboratories. He
re, we briefly review the clinical interest of measuring transstenotic
pressure gradients. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.