Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity of moder
n, eye-dedicated B-scanners in detecting optic disc cups and to correl
ate the echographic measurements with an optical assessment, A seconda
ry aim was to correlate the rim-to-rim diameter of the optic disc and
the width of the retrobulbar optic nerve on standardised A-scan, Metho
ds: A prospective study was conducted on 25 emmetropic subjects (50 ey
es) with discs and cups of various sizes. They were examined optically
by one observer using a high-magnification slit lamp and the 90 D Vol
k lens. Another observer measured the B-scan dimensions of the disc cu
ps and the retrobulbar optic nerve. Data from the two observers were c
ompared at the end of the study. Results: High resolution B-scan detec
ted optic disc cups of 0.5 mm or larger in all cases. A statistically
significant correlation was obtained between echographic measurements
and both vertical optical cup disc diameters and cup disc (C:D) ratios
(p<0.0001). Large C:D ratios (0.6 or larger) but small rim-to-rim dis
c diameter were reported as 'small' on echography. No correlation was
found between the measurement of retrobulbar nerve and the diameter of
the vertical optical disc diameter. Conclusion: Modern, eye-dedicated
ultrasonographic scanners are capable of detecting optic disc cups of
0.5 mm or larger. As there is a normal variation in optic disc rim-to
-rim diameter, and this cannot be measured using ultrasound, we sugges
t the reporting of a C:D ratio on ultrasonography to be potentially mi
sleading. Large disc cups are, however, easily seen and many are likel
y to be 'pathological'.