WHY FACTOR-ANALYSIS OFTEN IS THE INCORRECT MODEL FOR ANALYZING BIPOLAR CONCEPTS, AND WHAT MODEL TO USE INSTEAD

Citation
Wh. Vanschuur et Hal. Kiers, WHY FACTOR-ANALYSIS OFTEN IS THE INCORRECT MODEL FOR ANALYZING BIPOLAR CONCEPTS, AND WHAT MODEL TO USE INSTEAD, Applied psychological measurement, 18(2), 1994, pp. 97-110
Citations number
68
Categorie Soggetti
Psychologym Experimental","Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods
ISSN journal
01466216
Volume
18
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
97 - 110
Database
ISI
SICI code
0146-6216(1994)18:2<97:WFOITI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Factor analysis of data that conform to the unfolding model often resu lts in an extra factor. This artificial extra factor is particularly i mportant when data that conform to a bipolar unidimensional unfolding scale are factor analyzed. One bipolar dimension is expected, but two factors are found and often are interpreted as two unrelated dimension s. Although this extra factor phenomenon was pointed out in the early 1960s, it still is not widely recognized. The extra factor phenomenon in the unidimensional case is reviewed here. A numerical illustration is provided, and a number of diagnostics that can be used to determine whether data conform to the unidimensional unfolding model better tha n to the factor model are discussed. These diagnostics then are applie d to an empirical example.