Statisticians are too often satisfied by fitting data rather than inve
stigating the process out of which the data arose. The assumptions on
which they base their models may be quite unrealistic, and while it is
true that a model should not be more complicated than necessary, neit
her should it be too simple. Ways of approaching several sets of data
from different areas of clinical medicine are considered, and differen
t attitudes to the purpose of modelling highlighted. The transition fr
om smoothing data, through fitting curves, to modelling underlying pro
cesses is discussed.