MANAGEMENT OF HEMORRHAGE AFTER PERCUTANEOUS RENAL SURGERY

Citation
Dn. Kessaris et al., MANAGEMENT OF HEMORRHAGE AFTER PERCUTANEOUS RENAL SURGERY, The Journal of urology, 153(3), 1995, pp. 604-608
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00225347
Volume
153
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Part
1
Pages
604 - 608
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(1995)153:3<604:MOHAPR>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Renal hemorrhage is the most worrisome complication of percutaneous re nal surgery. Between August 1983 and August 1992 we performed 2,200 pe rcutaneous renal operations, with 17 patients (0.8%) requiring angiogr aphy and embolization for significant bleeding uncontrolled by the usu al measures. The angiographic diagnoses were arteriovenous fistula in 7 patients, pseudoaneurysm in 4, fistula and pseudoaneurysm in 2, and lacerated renal vessels in 2. A total of 15 patients required no furth er treatment after embolization, while 2 underwent either partial neph rectomy or open exploration. No risk factors for hemorrhage could be i dentified. We recommend angiography and embolization under 3 condition s: 1) in the immediate postoperative period when clamping of the nephr ostomy tube and a tamponade balloon catheter fail to control hemorrhag e (24% of our series), 2) in the early postoperative period (2 to 7 da ys) when the patient requires 3 or 4 units of blood after replacement of the initial blood loss (41% of our series) and 3) for sudden hemorr hage more than 7 days postoperatively (35% of our series).