PLATINUM PLUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE PLUS RADIOTHERAPY IS SUPERIOR TO PLATINUM ALONE IN HIGH-RISK EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER (RESIDUAL NEGATIVE AND EITHER STAGE-I OR STAGE-II, GRADE-3, OR STAGE-III, ANY GRADE)

Citation
Pj. Hoskins et al., PLATINUM PLUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE PLUS RADIOTHERAPY IS SUPERIOR TO PLATINUM ALONE IN HIGH-RISK EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER (RESIDUAL NEGATIVE AND EITHER STAGE-I OR STAGE-II, GRADE-3, OR STAGE-III, ANY GRADE), International journal of gynecological cancer, 5(2), 1995, pp. 134-142
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology",Oncology
ISSN journal
1048891X
Volume
5
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
134 - 142
Database
ISI
SICI code
1048-891X(1995)5:2<134:PPCPRI>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) referred to our institut ion are stratified into risk groups based on their stage, grade and pr esence of residual cancer, with a specific treatment policy for each g roup. One-hundred and thirty-one patients with no visible residual tum or following primary surgery and either stage I, grade 3; stage II, gr ade 3; or stage III, any grade EOC were treated between November 1983 and the end of December 1991. Regimen A (cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) and cyc lophosphamide 600 mg m(-2) intravenously every 4 weeks for 6 cycles wi th abdominopelvic irradiation between cycles 3 and 4) was used until A pril 1989 and was then replaced with Regimen B (cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) intravenously every 3 weeks for 6 cycles). The 5-year actuarial overal l and failure-free survivals were 78% and 64% respectively. Multivaria te analysis identified increasing stage and treatment with Regimen B a s independent adverse prognostic factors for failure-free survival. Th e importance of treatment regimen reached statistical significance for the stage I patients (P = 0.04) but not stage II (P = 0.11) or stage III (P = 0.79). It is possible to undertreat EOC as shown by the infer ior results achieved with Regimen B (single agent cisplatin) compared to Regimen A (cisplatin-cyclophosphamide, irradiation). This effect of treatment regimen was particularly important for the lower-stage pati ents. Our postulate is that treatment resistant clones are less regula rly present in lower-stage patients, and that a certain minimum amount of treatment is required to eliminate all the sensitive cancer.