Many Group Decision Support Systems are designed to work within a comp
lex organizational environment and to tackle complex strategic issues.
Many have called for these systems to be evaluated in relation to cle
ar success criteria. This paper addresses the issues that this request
raises and seeks to encourage a debate about alternative research met
hods appropriate to such a task. Specifically the paper discusses: the
purpose of the systems, the need to attend to the past and future of
a group, GDSS to support negotiation towards decision-making, the sign
ificance of the consultant client relationship, the role of decision m
odels, the duration of the intervention, and the role of a theoretical
framework. A number of research methods are discussed and some of the
problems in their use noted Ultimately the paper argues for more 'act
ion research' rather than less of any other sort of research.