A CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF 2 INDOLENT LYMPHOMA ENTITIES - MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA AND MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA (INCLUDING THE MUCOSA-ASSOCIATED LYMPHOID-TISSUE AND MONOCYTOID B-CELL SUBCATEGORIES) - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY
Ri. Fisher et al., A CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF 2 INDOLENT LYMPHOMA ENTITIES - MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA AND MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA (INCLUDING THE MUCOSA-ASSOCIATED LYMPHOID-TISSUE AND MONOCYTOID B-CELL SUBCATEGORIES) - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY, Blood, 85(4), 1995, pp. 1075-1082
The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the clinical presen
tation and natural history associated with two newly recognized pathol
ogic entities termed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and marginal zone lymp
homa (MZL), including the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and
monocytoid B-cell subcategories, and (2) to determine whether these e
ntities differ clinically from the other relatively indolent non-Hodgk
in's lymphomas with which they have been previously classified. We rev
iewed the conventional pathology and clinical course of 376 patients w
ho had no prior therapy; had stage III/IV disease; were classified as
Working Formulation categories A, B, C, D, or E; and received cyclopho
sphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) on Southwest Onc
ology Group (SWOG) studies no. 7204, 7426, or 7713. All slides were re
viewed by the three pathologists who reached a consensus diagnosis. Ag
e, sex, performance status, bone marrow and/or gastrointestinal involv
ement, failure-free survival, and overall survival were compared among
all the categories. We found that (1) MCL and MZL each represent appr
oximately 10% of stage III or IV patients previously classified as Wor
king Formulation categories A through E and treated with CHOP on SWOG
clinical trials; (2) the failure-free survival and overall survival of
patients with MZL is the same as that of patients with Working Formul
ation categories A through E, but the failure-free survival and overal
l survival of the monocytoid B-cell patients were higher than that of
the MALT lymphoma patients (P = .009 and .007, respectively); and (3)
the failure-free survival and overall survival of patients with MCL is
significantly worse than that of patients with Working Formulation ca
tegories A through E (P = .0002 and .0001, respectively). In conclusio
n, patients with advanced stage MALT lymphomas may have a more aggress
ive course than previously recognized. Patients with MCL do not have a
n indolent lymphoma and are candidates for innovative therapy. (C) 199
5 by The American Society of Hematology.