Sr. Jackson et al., ARE NON-RELEVANT OBJECTS REPRESENTED IN WORKING-MEMORY - THE EFFECT OF NONTARGET OBJECTS ON REACH AND GRASP KINEMATICS, Experimental Brain Research, 102(3), 1995, pp. 519-530
The role of visual information and the precise nature of the represent
ations used in the control of prehension movements has frequently been
studied by having subjects reach for target objects in the absence of
visual information. Such manipulations have often been described as p
reventing visual feedback; however, they also impose a working memory
load not found in prehension movements with normal vision. In this stu
dy we examined the relationship between working memory and visuospatia
l attention using a prehension task. In this study six healthy, right-
handed adult subjects reached for a wooden block under conditions of n
ormal vision, or else with their eyes closed having first observed the
placement of the target. Furthermore, the role of visuospatial attent
ion was examined by studying the effect, on transport and grasp kinema
tics, of placing task-irrelevant ''flanker'' objects (a wooden cylinde
r) within the visual field on a proportion of trials. Our results clea
rly demonstrated that the position of flankers produced clear interfer
ence effects on both transport and grasp kinematics. Furthermore, inte
rference effects were significantly greater when subjects reached to t
he remembered location of the target (i.e., with eyes closed). The fin
ding that the position of flanker objects influences both transport an
d grasp components of the prehension movement is taken as support for
the view that these components may prepare a coordinated movement in w
hich both transport and grasp are specifically adapted to the task in
hand. The finding that flanker effects occur primarily when reaching t
o the remembered location of the target object is interpreted as suppo
rting the view that attentional processes do not work efficiently on w
orking memory representations.