Ipj. Vangeel et al., PHOTOSENSITIZING EFFICACY OF MTHPC-PDT COMPARED TO PHOTOFRIN-PDT IN THE RIF1 MOUSE-TUMOR AND NORMAL SKIN, International journal of cancer, 60(3), 1995, pp. 388-394
The new photosensitizer, meso-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTPHC) was co
mpared with Photofrin in the murine RIFI tumour and in normal mouse sk
in. A range of mTHPC or Photofrin doses were given at intervals of I h
r to 7 days before illumination. mTHPC-PDT resulted in much higher tum
our phototoxicity with longer regrowth delays and more cures. The RIFI
rumour could be effectively treated with 30 J cm(-1) (interstitial il
lumination) at I day after mTHPC, whereas 4 to 13 times higher light d
oses were required with Photofrin for an equivalent anti-tumour effect
. High doses of mTHPC also caused more skin phototoxicity (superficial
illumination) than Photofrin for the I-day illumination interval. Eva
luating both tumour and normal skin photosensitization, the largest th
erapeutic gain factor (TGF) for mTHPC-PDT was achieved with a low drug
dose (0.15 mg kg(-1)) at I day before illumination (TGF = 5.6, relati
ve to Photofrin PDT). The duration of cutaneous photosensitivity for m
THPC was shorter than for Photofrin. The light dose required to produc
e a desquamation response in 50% of the animals increased more than 20
-fold over the period I to 7 days after high doses of mTHPC, whereas t
his light dose only increased by a factor of 2 from I to 7 days after
Photofrin. The large therapeutic gains seen for mTHPC-mediated PDT com
pared to Photofrin, plus the rapid fading of skin photosensitization,
suggest that mTHPC is a potent photosensitizer suitable for clinical t
esting. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.