M. Nordlander et al., VASCULAR VERSUS MYOCARDIAL SELECTIVITY OF DIHYDROPYRIDINE CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS AS STUDIED IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO, Pharmacology & toxicology, 76(1), 1995, pp. 56-62
The use of in vitro models for the study of cardiovascular effects of
drugs may not be representative for the in vivo therapeutic effects. H
owever, drug effects in vivo are often difficult to assess because of
counteracting reflexes and auto-regulatory rearrangements. To solve th
is dilemma, the present study presents a two-step method using bath in
vivo and in vitro techniques to investigate vascular versus myocardia
l selectivity of three dihydropyridine calcium antagonists: amlodipine
, felodipine and nifedipine. The ratio between intravenous drug doses
causing 25% reduction in mean arterial blood pressure (vascular potenc
y) and in heart rate (cardiac chronotropic potency) was determined in
anaesthetised spontaneously hypertensive rats during autonomic cardiac
blockade. In isolated hearts from spontaneously hypertensive rats, th
e inotropic versus chronotropic potency ratio was determined between t
he two drug concentrations producing a 25% reduction in cardiac contra
ctility (dP/dt max) and in heart rate, respectively. The vascular vers
us chronotropic selectivity in vivo was higher for felodipine (121) th
an for nifedipine (47) and amlodipine (15). The inotropic versus chron
otropic potency ratios obtained from the in vitro studies were: felodi
pine (1), amlodipine (2) and nifedipine (20). The in vitro results wer
e used to extrapolate the vascular versus cardiac chronotropic selecti
vity obtained iii vivo to a vascular versus myocardial selectivity dru
g ratio, being 20 and 60 times higher for felodipine than for amlodipi
ne and nifedipine, respectively.