Ee. Klein et al., DOSIMETRY AND CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF DYNAMIC WEDGE, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 31(3), 1995, pp. 583-592
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Wedge-shaped isodoses are desired in a number of clinical sit
uations. Physical wedge filters have provided nominal angled isodoses
with dosimetric consequences of beam hardening, increased peripheral d
osing, nonidealized gradients at deep depths, along with the practical
consequences of filter handling and placement problems. Dynamic wedgi
ng uses a combination of a moving jaw and changing dose rate to achiev
e angled isodoses, The clinical implementation of dynamic wedge and an
accompanying quality assurance program are discussed in detail. Metho
ds and Materials: The accelerator at our facility has two photon energ
ies (6 MV and 18 MV), currently with dynamic wedge angles of 15 degree
s, 30 degrees, 45 degrees and 60 degrees, The segmented treatment tabl
es (STT) that drive the jaw in concert with a changing dose rate are u
nique for field sizes ranging from 4.0 cm to 20.0 cm in 0.5 cm steps,
resulting in 256 STTs. Transmission wedge factors were measured for ea
ch STT with an ion chamber, Isodose profiles were accumulated with fil
m after dose conversion, For treatment-planning purposes, d(max) ortho
gonal dose profiles were measured for open and dynamic fields, Physica
l filters were assigned empirically via the ratio of open and wedge pr
ofiles. Results: A nonlinear relationship with wedge factor and field
size was found, The factors were found to be independent of the statio
nary field setting or second order blocking. Dynamic wedging provided
more consistent gradients across the field compared with physical filt
ers, Percent depth doses were found to be closer to open field, The cr
eated physical filters provided planned isodoses that closely resemble
d measured isodoses, Comparative isodose plans show improvement with d
ynamic wedging. Conclusions: Dynamic wedging has practical and dosimet
ric advantages over physical filters, Table collisions with physical f
ilters are alleviated. Treatment planning has been solved with an empi
rical solution. Dynamic wedge is a positive replacement for physical f
ilters, and a first step for commercial introduction of dynamic confor
mal therapy.