Observers made time-to-contact judgments about an imagined moving obje
ct that passed through an area of the visual field previously adapted
to a single direction of real motion. The direction of imagined motion
varied relative to the direction of adapting motion. When imagined mo
tion was in the same direction as that experienced during adaptation,
imagined speed was slowed; when imagined motion was in the opposite di
rection, its speed was increased; when adaptation and imagined motions
were orthogonal, imagined speed was unaffected. The particular influe
nce that prior adaptation has on imagined speed suggests that imagined
motion and real vision may engage common neural mechanisms without be
ing functionally equivalent. Negative aftereffects observed in imagine
d motion imply that the imagination represents movement as an inferenc
e from position changes of static images. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc
.